The Lawyer Who Listens: Inside Timothy E. Zerillo’s Method Of Justice
There’s a jail on State Street in Kennebec County. It’s plain brick, nothing dramatic. One night, back in December 2014, a man inside that jail kept yelling for help. His name was Dana Kitchin.
Author:K. N.Oct 26, 202557.3K Shares764.7K Views
There’s a jail on State Street in Kennebec County. It’s plain brick, nothing dramatic. One night, back in December 2014, a man inside that jail kept yelling for help. His name was Dana Kitchin.
They said he was sick. Not just sick… he was dying. Other inmates later told reporters they could hear him calling out, pounding on the metal, begging for somebody to come. Hours went by. Nobody moved fast enough. By morning, he was gone.
The medical report said ruptured spleen. That’s a clean phrase for something ugly. Internal bleeding, hours of pain, no treatment. Then silence.
Most stories like this fade quick. They hit a line or two in the local paper and disappear. But this one stuck because Timothy E. Zerillo, a Portland lawyer, decided not to let it slide.
Four years after Kitchin died, Zerillo and attorney John Burke filed a federal suit, Kitchin v. Kennebec County, saying the jail’s staff ignored a man who was clearly in crisis. They didn’t file it for noise. They filed it because someone had to put a line in the sand.
The complaint said officers walked past the cell, heard the cries, saw the pain, and still did nothing. The legal term is deliberate indifference. In regular words, it means you knew a man was dying and decided not to care.
Zerillo wasn’t trying to make headlines. He wanted accountability, plain and simple. When the government takes a man’s freedom, it also takes responsibility for his life. That’s the principle he kept repeating, in filings, in interviews, in courtrooms that smell like dust and coffee.
Zerillo’s not one of those lawyers who throw big speeches for TV. Quiet guy. Careful with words. Keeps notes even during small talk.
But when he steps into a case like this, he digs. Every log, every timestamp, every camera angle. The pattern he found was simple: a man in pain, ignored for hours, no nurse on duty, no doctor called, no urgency. He told the court that what killed Dana Kitchin wasn’t just an organ failure; it was a system failure.
People who know Zerillo say he takes things personally, even when he pretends not to. Maybe that’s why the Kitchin case got under his skin. It’s not about one cell or one night. It’s about the idea that inside a locked building, no one’s watching until it’s too late.
The county tried to hold the usual line. “Procedures were followed,” they said. “Staff did their best.” But the discovery files told a rougher story.
Videos showed officers walking past the cell more than once. The logbook had gaps. Medical notes were thin, almost careless. You could see the pattern… people writing things after the fact, covering themselves with paper.
Zerillo’s complaint said that it wasn’t enough. It’s not paperwork that saves lives. It’s action. The lawsuit hit the federal docket in 2018, arguing constitutional violations and wrongful death under state law. It didn’t ask for sympathy. It asked for proof that the county understood what “duty of care” actually means.
Some might say, it’s just one inmate. Happens everywhere. But that’s exactly the point; it happens everywhere. Small jails across America run on skeleton crews, patchwork medical contracts, and long nights where no one checks the cells until morning.
When Zerillo filed the suit, it wasn’t only about one man. It was about forcing everyone to look at how fragile the system really is. One broken policy, one missing nurse, one shift where people get lazy, and someone dies.
He told a local paper once, “If the state locks you up, the state has to keep you alive.” No legal jargon, no fancy spin. Just a line that sticks because it’s true.
The Kitchin family sat through years of hearings and paperwork. They weren’t chasing money. They wanted someone to say it out loud that Dana didn’t deserve to die like that.
Every time the story came up again, old wounds opened. For the family, the lawsuit became the only way to keep Dana from vanishing into the system’s memory hole.
Kitchin v. Kennebec County leans on civil-rights law, Section 1983, the statute that lets citizens hold government bodies liable when their policies violate constitutional rights. It’s a tough road. Plaintiffs have to prove more than a mistake. They have to show an attitude… a culture that looked away.
That’s what Zerillo’s team set out to do. They argued that the county’s medical structure was broken, that staff weren’t trained for emergencies, that management allowed a level of neglect that bordered on routine.
Other counties started paying attention. Quietly, some changed their overnight medical procedures. Maine’s legislators began discussing new oversight rules. One lawsuit, and suddenly the silence around jail healthcare cracked open just a little.
Zerillo doesn’t chase praise. People say he listens more than he talks. Maybe that’s why he’s good at these cases. He hears what others miss, the tone in a witness’s voice, the way a guard hesitates before answering.
For him, the Kitchin case is a reminder that justice is not loud. It’s slow. It’s paperwork, patience, and persistence. It’s telling a story that no one wanted to hear and refusing to stop telling it until something changes.
The legal process crawls. Motions, hearings, sealed evidence, more motions. But even before the verdict, something shifted. Other families with similar stories began reaching out. Some said reading about the Kitchin case gave them the courage to speak. That’s the kind of win you can’t measure in damages.
What happened to Dana Kitchin should never have happened to anyone. The tragedy isn’t only that he died; it’s that he died while people stood close enough to save him.
For Timothy E. Zerillo, the fight isn’t about fame or politics. It’s about one idea: if you take a man’s freedom, you owe him care.
K. N.
Author
Latest Articles
Popular Articles